The FBI once put men in prison for threatening to kill presidents.
Now the man who ran that FBI is the one facing those charges.
Watch what James Comey did when a friendly reporter gave him every chance to defend himself.
Comey Went on TV and Said Nothing
Comey sat down with MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace on Monday – the same Nicolle Wallace who spent four years calling Trump a fascist – and she handed him the easiest possible setup.
She asked him what he's actually accused of doing.
He said it plainly: "Communicating, making and communicating a threat to assassinate the president of the United States."
Then she asked what his defense is.
https://twitter.com/nicksortor/status/2053948826570928128?s=20
And James Comey – the man who spent eight years running the most powerful law enforcement agency on earth, who wrote a bestselling book about his own righteousness, who has given hundreds of interviews attacking Trump – refused to answer.
He hid behind court rules.
He said he "believes in the independent federal judiciary" and doesn't want to talk outside of court.
Let that land for a second.
The Man Who Leaked FBI Memos Has Found Religion on Discretion
This is the same James Comey who leaked confidential memos about his private conversations with the president to a friend – specifically to trigger a special counsel investigation against Trump.
That was 2017.
Federal law prohibits FBI directors from leaking internal memos.
Comey did it anyway, told Congress he did it on purpose, and faced zero consequences.
Now he's discovered that rules matter and that discussing active legal cases is inappropriate.
The transformation is remarkable.
https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/2054280448113803708?s=20
Comey also said Trump has "a bottomless desire to gain revenge" and promised he won't stop criticizing Trump because "that's required if you care about America."
He made that statement in the same breath as refusing to discuss the specific criminal charge against him.
He'll criticize the president all day long.
He just won't explain why he made what the government is calling an assassination threat.
This Is a Pattern the Media Won't Show You
Comey's indictment didn't come out of nowhere.
In May 2025, federal prosecutors charged him with making a threat to assassinate President Trump – a charge under 18 U.S.C. § 871, the same statute that has been used to prosecute hundreds of Americans who posted threats on social media, sent letters, or made statements construed as threatening a president.
That law carries up to five years in federal prison.
What's remarkable about the Comey situation is the source material.
The alleged threat wasn't a private message or a dark web post.
It came through public channels – the same channels Comey used to position himself as Trump's most credible institutional critic – which is why prosecutors had an easy evidentiary path to the indictment.
https://twitter.com/allenanalysis/status/2053873040530792740?s=20
And now Comey is on television every week, still attacking Trump, still playing the role of America's civic conscience – while his lawyers quietly work to keep the specifics far away from public scrutiny before trial.
The media is playing along perfectly.
Friendly hosts like Wallace treat him as a resistance hero rather than a criminal defendant, giving him platforms to attack the president he is accused of threatening, without ever pressing him on the substance of what he actually did.
That's not journalism.
That's a protection racket.
Here Is What This Really Means for Trump's Enemies
Here's what your neighbors in the media won't say out loud.
The Comey indictment is a signal to every former government official who spent the last eight years treating threats against Trump as acceptable political speech.
Kathy Griffin held up a fake severed Trump head for a photo shoot and got a CNN special.
Madonna told a crowd she'd "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House" and got a standing ovation.
https://twitter.com/Beardvet/status/2054028846421115002?s=20
The institutional left treated all of it as righteous anger rather than what it was.
Comey spent years positioning himself as Trump's most credible institutional critic – a former FBI director, a registered Republican before 2016, a man with law enforcement credibility that gave his attacks on Trump weight that a random MSNBC host couldn't provide.
If he crossed the line from criticism into threat, and if prosecutors can prove it, the precedent reaches well beyond one man's career.
Every former official who stood in front of cheering crowds, who went on book tours calling Trump a threat to democracy, who sat in MSNBC greenrooms saying whatever they wanted with zero consequences – they're all watching this case very carefully right now.
Comey going silent isn't strategy.
It's fear.
Sources:
- Pam Key, "Comey: I Will Continue to Criticize Trump — 'Required If You Care About America,'" Breitbart, May 11, 2025.
- "James Comey Admits Leaking Memos to Prompt Special Counsel," Fox News, June 8, 2017.
